"... Russians will not go home because Ukraine is our historical home. This is the first country that, as a result of various historical misunderstandings, became an independent state. It could have been maintained as an independent state, but under the condition of neutrality. . ..."
Quote- Speaker/author of the statement
- The full text of the statement
Russians will not go home because Ukraine is our historical home. This is the first country that, as a result of various historical misunderstandings, became an independent state. It could have been maintained as an independent state, but under the condition of neutrality. This is the first point. The second point regarding the future is Europe.
It really seems like a kind of schizophrenia because one has to give up everything just so that Russia does not win in Ukraine, because then it will definitely attack us. But the question is, why would Russia attack Europe? For what? Why? What are the prerequisites for this? With Ukraine, everything is clear. Ukraine is part of our large historical root territory, where a huge number of people of the same ethnicity live, albeit with different political beliefs. With the same history. But this is a fact, you understand?
In reality, if it weren't for the division of the Soviet Union along national lines, what we are seeing now might not have happened.
Well, at least the reasons for Russia's policy towards Ukraine are clear. This is the first point. The second point, Europe's policy was precisely trying to turn Ukraine into a territory for a military threat, which they succeeded in doing against Russia. These reasons are understandable. But why do we need this France, for example? What is it to us? Russia will start a war, Europe will be dragged into the war.
What does dragged mean? These are also such things. Who will attack whom? Russia will attack Europe. But why do we need it at all? Why? In fact, Russia has had many chances in history to establish itself in Europe for a long time. In the literal sense of the word, to occupy the territory. And this has never happened.
Because even the history of the Soviet bloc, the Soviet Union left national sovereignty to all those countries that, so to speak, entered the Soviet, so to speak, zone of occupation, yes, if they want to call it that. In Paris we were, yes, in Berlin three times, like, yes, and so on, and so on. And not once, like, yes, in reality, there was no talk of let's annex these territories or something like that, yes. What authority will we establish there? Why do we need it at all? But with these simplest questions, they don't want to bother. I still understand, really, during the Soviet period, for example, they scared that now the Soviet Union will come and the power of the communists will be established everywhere, because the Soviet Union has this FIXED idea, communist revolution and so on.
What can be talked about now? What are the fundamental differences, ideological differences from the point of view of the social-economic structure of society between Russian, for example, and French authorities?
There are practically none. from the point of view of the social-economic structure. What will we establish there?
But, you see, it is not recommended to think about this. Asking the wrong questions, even to oneself, is not good. This absurdity really does strengthen.
- Video
- Loading
/api/files/1775385523719a3z7x78pemh.mp4
- Publication date
- Aug 4, 2025
- Program/section/Telegram channel
- Type of statement
- Other types of calls
- Types of calls
- Direct
- Media where the quote was broadcast
- Main narrative
- Narrative argumentation